Water Quality and Animal
Feeding Operations in Arizona: A Producer's Notebook
Summary of ADEQ’s CAFO Compliance
Inspection Program
Submitted by ADEQ
www.adeq.state.az.us
Note: Any violations that the state
may find are violations of the state general agricultural permit
and are not necessarily violations of the federal permitting requirements
for CAFOs.
Why Livestock Facilities Are
Inspected in Arizona By ADEQ
Nationwide and in Arizona, the potential for
surface and ground water pollution exists through livestock facility
discharge of manure-contaminated run off to natural waterways and
through wastewater leaching to aquifers. ADEQ has established a
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Inspection Program
for the purpose of evaluating individual livestock facilities for
potential or existing off-site discharges of wastewater and impacts
to aquifers. In order to curtail unauthorized discharges, recommendations,
notices of opportunity to correct and notices of violations are
issued to livestock facilities to initiate the corrections of deficiencies
in waste-management practices and waste-handling structures. Additionally,
and if warranted, an administrative or civil action may be taken
to compel compliance.
ADEQ’s Regulatory Authority For Livestock
Facility Inspections And Waste Management Enforcement
The authority of ADEQ employees to inspect
livestock facilities is granted through Arizona
Revise Statutes (A.R.S.) § 49-203B.1. ADEQ inspections of livestock
facilities are performed to evaluate livestock facility compliance
with Arizona
Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R18-9-402 (agricultural general
permits: nitrogen fertilizers); A.A.C.R18-9-403 (agricultural general
permits: concentrated animal feeding operations); A.A.C. R18-11-108
(narrative water quality standards); and A.A.C. R 18-11-109 (numeric
water quality standards). The agricultural general permit rules
have been adopted pursuant to A.R.S. § 49-247 and the surface water
quality standards rules have been adopted pursuant to Article 2,
Chapter 2, of A.R.S. Title 49.
EPA’s Regulatory Authority For Livestock
Facility Inspections And Waste Management Enforcement In Arizona
The United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) also has regulatory authority to conduct inspections
of livestock facilities independently or jointly with ADEQ. EPA’s
authority to inspect Arizona’s livestock operations is derived from
the Clean Water Act’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) regulations. Presently, ADEQ does not yet have primacy
(authority) to enforce the NPDES regulations or permits, therefore,
livestock facilities may be inspected for compliance with applicable
federal and state rules and requirements by both the ADEQ and EPA.
Which Livestock Facilities
Will Be Inspected By ADEQ
Currently, ADEQ is conducting an initial round
of statewide inspections of all livestock operations which have
about 300 Animal Units (Aus) or more. Subsequent inspections may
be limited to: facilities with more than 1,000 AUs, facilities with
less than 1,000 AUs with previous waste management problems, or
facilities in close proximity to waterways ("water of the state").
In addition to routine compliance inspections, ADEQ responds to
livestock facility discharge complaints.
What
To Expect When A Livestock Facility Is Inspected By ADEQ
Upon arrival, an ADEQ inspector will present
an ADEQ photo identification badge. The inspector will explain
and review the Notice of Inspection Rights form, applicable rules,
and checklist to be used during the inspection. Copies of the form,
rules, and checklist will be provided for the facility owner or
representative and then the inspector will tour the facility accompanied
by the owner or representative. The inspector will take photographs
and global position (GPS) measurements of the facility. Water samples
may be collected if a discharge of contaminated run-off by manure,
wastewater or tailwater is observed. Inspections generally take
forty-five minutes to two hours to conduct depending on the complexity
of the waste handling system and/or the presence of a discharge.
Upon completion of the inspection, the ADEQ inspector will discuss
with the facility owner or representative any compliance problems
observed during the inspection. An inspection report will generally
be sent to the facility within thirty days.
What
The ADEQ Inspector Is Looking For
Compliance with the Arizona General Permit:
The ADEQ inspector will be concerned with effective management of
manure and wastewater at the facility. Specifically, the ADEQ inspector
is looking for compliance with the two agricultural general permits
rules: numeric water quality standards and narrative water quality
standards. The ADEQ inspector will examine the following: site
surface gradient and drainage flow, manure storage areas, handling
of washwater, lagoon capacity and integrity, and the potential or
actual release of tailwaters containing wastewater (lagoon water)
off the facility site. Basically, the ADEQ inspector is looking
for any actual or potential run-off or discharge of water contaminated
by animal wastes from the facility. If evidence of actual or potential
discharge is observed during the inspection, the final destination
of the wastewater will be tracked to determine if there is a connection
to a surface water.
Compliance with NPDES regulations:
ADEQ will make a notation of any federal violation observed during
an inspection. The violation will be mentioned in the inspection
report. ADEQ will notify EPA of any violation it finds.
Compliance with Drinking Water System Regulations:
In addition to compliance with the Arizona general permits for livestock
facilities, the ADEQ inspector will determine if a facility may
qualify as a drinking water system. If the ADEQ inspector believes
that the facility may qualify, then the facility will be referred
to Drinking Water personnel at ADEQ or the delegated county.
Compliance with Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act: Also, if an alteration of a Water of the U.S. is
observed, the facility will be referred to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers for possible 404 permit requirement or violation. Alteration
of a waterway (including dry washes) include; removal or addition
of material or changing the course of the waterway. If lagoons
or other waste containing structures are observed in a wash or waterway
during an inspection, the facility could be referred to flood control
districts for possible enforcement action.
What Are The Possible
Results of A Livestock Facility Inspection
Based on the state agricultural general permits
and water quality standards, facilities will be evaluated and issued
an inspection report with no violation, a notice of opportunity
to correct (NOC), or a notice of violation (NOV). When no notices
of violations are issued, ADEQ will not pursue any compliance action,
however, a facility may receive recommendations to improve waste
handling at the facility. In the case of ADEQ issuing an NOC or
NOV, facilities are instructed to immediately cease discharges and
are given a specific amount of time (usually up to120 days) to correct
the violations. Also, the EPA, US Army Corp of Engineers, counties,
and flood control districts may seek violations for lack of compliance
to their respective rules and regulations. If compliance is not
achieved through an NOC or NOV, ADEQ may take administrative or
civil action.
Wastewater Discharge
Conditions Which Warrant NOCs and NOVs
NOCs are issued when actual or potential discharges
of contaminated run-off or other wastewater discharges (such as
washwater or lagoon water discharged into ditches) exist and do
not have a connection to a "water of the state." NOCs
are also issued when contaminated tailwater (irrigation water mixed
with lagoon water) discharges do not have a connection to
a "water of the state." In addition, NOCs are issued for
violations of general Aquifer Protection Permit (APP) rules.
NOVs are issued when there is a connection
to a water of the state and one of the following has occurred; an
actual discharge of manure run-off, tailwater run-off (if a water
quality standard is violated), or other wastewater discharge. Connection
to surface waters include "direct" discharges through pipes,
channels, or ditches and also include "indirect" discharges
into pipes, channels, ditches, and canals which connect to a ditch
or canal that connects to a surface water. An example of an indirect
discharge would be: contaminated run-off flowing into a ditch, which
connects to a feeder canal, which connects to the Buckeye Canal,
which connects to the Gila River.
What Happens When Conditions
of NOCs or NOVs Are Not Met
Escalation of enforcement action by ADEQ is
possible when conditions of an NOC or NOV are not met. For example,
an NOC may lead to an NOV if violations are not corrected. NOVs
may lead to administrative orders if violations are not addressed.
For serious discharge cases, the maximum civil penalty a livestock
facility can be fined by the Superior Court is $25,000.00 per day
per violation, pursuant to A.R.S. § 49-262.C.
Copies of all of ADEQ’s inspection reports
are sent to the EPA, therefore, the EPA is advised of the NOCs and
NOVs issued in the state. The EPA may seek enforcement of the Clean
Water Act in addition to any enforcement action sought by ADEQ.
The EPA is authorized to enforce the provisions of the Clean Water
Act including the CAFO requirements, as the State of Arizona currently
lacks authority to enforce the Federal Clean Water Act and the NPDES
permits. The EPA may issue fines of up to $25,000 per day for each
violation. In cases where NPDES violations endanger the health
or life of another person, the EPA can pursue criminal penalties
of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of not more than fifteen years.
What ADEQ Expects For
Closure OF NOCs And NOVs
All notices of violations have "documenting
compliance" which must be demonstrated before they are closed.
The specific means to achieve compliance (stopping and preventing
discharges), is not provided by ADEQ. However, ADEQ does point
out what needs to be addressed and may make general recommendations
to remedy the situation. ADEQ informs the facility operators that
the NRCS, Cooperative Extension Service, and private consultants
may be able to assist the facility in addressing their discharge
problems.
To close a notice, proof that compliance has
been achieved must be provided by the facility. Proof is provided
through photographs, documentation and correspondence with the agencies
or individuals which assisted the facility, on-site visits by ADEQ
inspectors, copies of constructions plans, receipts of repairs,
or correspondence from the facility owner. Proof of compliance
must be received by ADEQ, within the required time frame, in order
for the notice to be closed and to avoid escalation of enforcement
action. During the subsequent inspections, ADEQ inspectors will
determine if the facility has maintained the corrective actions.
What To Expect When the New NPDES General
Permit Is Issued For Arizona
The effective date for the Arizona NPDES General
Permit for CAFOs is August 27, 2001. Once issued, CAFO operations
can submit an NOI (Notice of Intent) to be covered under the general
NPDES permit. Some facilities may not be eligible for the general
NPDES permit and need to apply for coverage under an individual
permit. Under the general NPDES permit for CAFOs, operators will
be required to develop a Best Management
Plan (BMP) and a Nutrient Management Plan (NMP).
A facility which is operating under an approved
NMP may discharge stormwater from land application fields under
the ‘agricultural stormwater exemption.’ Note: ADEQ currently considers
discharges from land application areas as violations of the R18-9-402
agricultural general permit.
Livestock
Facilities (AFOs and CAFOs)
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality
County
|
Dairies
|
Feedlots
|
SwineFacilities
|
Poultry Facilities
|
Total
|
Cochise
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
4
|
Green Lee
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Maricopa
|
96
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
106
|
Mohave
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
Navajo
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
Pima
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Pinal
|
12
|
12
|
1
|
?
|
25
|
Santa Cruz
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Yavapai
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
Yuma
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
5
|
Total
|
118
|
22
|
8
|
5
|
153
|
Page updated 7/02
|