|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methods
& Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives
1&2: |
|
|
|
EDUFAIM
survey given to clients as they entered the program and again 3 months
laterclient demographics, personal variables, measure on empowerment
to seek employment (Objective 1) and constructs associated with mental
health (Objective 2). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
11
measures to evaluate motivational, cognitive, locus of control and
self-efficacy aspects of individual empowerment (Objective 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
5
psychometric measures which included self-esteem, global life satisfaction,
positive and negative affect, anxiety, and depression (Objective 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Objective
3: |
|
|
|
Surveys
were developed by the program originators for each class so relevant
outcomes could be assessed for each of the following classes: being
a parent, self and relationship, job readiness, money management,
eating right, housing, getting hired. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Surveys
were given prior to and after completing the class |
|
|
|
Objective
4: |
|
|
|
Interviews
were conducted on a sample of EDUFAIM clients to understand the clients'
perceptions of the EDUFAIM program and the impact it had on them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Open-ended
questions designed to gather information related to transformational
learning as a result of EDUFAIM programming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Identify
aspects of programming that were significant from the client's perspective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
In-depth
interviews with 74 randomly selected EDUFAIM clients |
|
|
|
Objective
5: |
|
|
|
Analysis
of state welfare data supplied by the Montana Department of Public
Health and Human Services and the impact of EDUFAIM affiliation on
cost related measures. |
|
Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective
1: |
|
|
|
Used
SPSS to conduct t-tests to compare pre- and 3 month follow-up data |
|
|
|
Objective
2: |
|
|
|
Used
SPSS to conduct t-tests to compare pre- and 3 month follow up data |
|
|
|
Objective
3: |
|
|
|
Used
SPSS to compute percentages for pretest and posttest |
|
|
|
Objective
4: |
|
|
|
Used
NUD*IST for qualitative analysis of all interview data7 themes
identified |
|
|
|
Objective
5: |
|
|
|
Logistic
regression was employed to determine the impact of EDUFAIM affiliation
on cost related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Statistically
significant improvement in the following areas were found at some
point over the 4-year evaluation results: job seeking efficacy and
perceived job seeking efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Global
measure of life satisfaction, positive and negative affect, anxiety,
and depression measures all showed a statistically significant improvement. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
In
85% of the areas measured, more clients responded correctly in the
posttest than in the pretest Although this was not noted in all classes,
the overall trend indicated positive changes in reported behaviors,
knowledge, and attitudes across the vast majority of classes evaluated. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Seven
themes were identified that crosscut the interview questions. The
themes were labeled life skills, empowerment, social benefits, program
value, facilitating learning, program weakness, and "just do
it." Based on inductive analyses of client responses, it was
concluded that EDUFAIM was fostering transformative learning. Narratives
from clients demonstrated an empowered sense of self, fundamental
changes in self-perception, adoption of more functional approaches
to life, and growth in other ways. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
EDUFAIM
clients had almost two times the probability of obtaining any employment
and more than two times the probability of generating any earnings.
|
|
|
|