Social
Competencies
Social Competence
Dawn Scott
Introduction
Adolescents currently face more potentially negative experiences at younger
ages than ever before, including drugs, suicide and violence (Holmes, 1995).
Consequently, it is appropriate to identify the factors which help protect
adolescents from these negative experiences. Emerging theories of youth
development such as resiliency, self-efficacy, and risk/protective factors
have stressed social competence as an important dimension of successful
adolescent development. An understanding of the development, maintenance,
and enhancement of social competence is useful in determining how to help
protect adolescents from negative influences and assist them in reaching
their optimal potential.
It generally is agreed that social competence is domain specific and developmental.
Yet defining social competence is not an easy task; no consensual definition
exists. Definitions vary according to their usefulness to differing theories
and approaches. Typically, definitions fall into two main categories: global,
generalized definitions; and definitions which consider specific components
and skills (competencies) which serve as indicators of social competence
(Peterson & Leigh, 1990). Definitions also differ according to a focus on
either internal processes and behaviors or external outcomes (Dodge & Murphy,
1984). Since the effectiveness of social behavior can only be determined
within the context of a particular social environment including communities,
peer groups, families and cultures (Oppenheimer, 1988), it appears that
both individual behaviors and social outcomes are important considerations
in defining socially competent behavior.
The following indicators can be considered component elements of social
competence.
Summary
Socially competent adolescents have a sense of belonging, are valued,
and are given opportunities to contribute to society (Gullotta, 1990),
which to a large extent is made possible within the various social environments
where adolescents live such as family, school, and community. For example,
family variables such as parenting style and family communication patterns
are found to strongly influence adolescent social competence (for review,
Peterson & Leigh, 1990). The development of social competence is facilitated
by strong social support, through supportive relationships and a supportive
sociocultural and physical environment; inhibitors of social competence
include cultural and social barriers based upon factors such as race/ethnicity,
gender, and socioeconomic status (Bloom, 1990). In addition, resiliency
research (e.g., Rutter, 1987) points to individual qualities and protective
processes which influence the ability to overcome adverse environments
and function competently.
Social competence must first be operationally defined as a collection
of specific behaviors and abilities before social competence promotion
programs can be designed and implemented (Rathjen & Foreyt, 1980). Interventions
intended to enhance social competence are often a combination of health
promotion and problem prevention programs such as life skills training
programs (e.g. Botvin, 1996; Danish, 1996) which attempt to reduce risk
behaviors as well as promote healthy adjustment and development. It has
been found that the most effective programs are multi-dimensional and
multi-level such as the combination of skills-based approaches with environmentally-oriented
approaches (Schinke, McAlister, Orlandi, & Botvin, 1990). The importance
of addressing affective (e.g., stress management), cognitive (e.g., problem
solving), and behavioral (e.g., social skills training) components of
social competence in enhancement efforts has been suggested by many researchers
(e.g., Caplan & Weissberg, 1988).
Weissberg, Barton, & Shriver (1996) cite outcome research for social competence
promotion programs which show positive effects on adolescents' problem
solving skills, social relations with peers, school adjustment, and reductions
in high risk behaviors. They view social competence promotion in the school
setting as a "highly promising and appropriate educational strategy for
preventing high risk behavior" (p. 287). It has been found that the most
enduring outcomes are a result of real world application to promote the
generalization of skills, and consistency of intervention throughout the
school years so children are allowed to build on previous learning. As
with most intervention programs, the generalization of what is learned
is the greatest challenge. Learned skills and desired outcomes do not
always match. The more comprehensive the intervention effort, the more
likely that learned skills will be applied in various contexts and behavioral
changes will be sustained over time.
There is no one "picture" of a socially competent person, no specific
list of skills that indicate competence, and no one way to enhance social
competence. What has been found to be most effective is a unified effort
to ensure that the development, maintenance and enhancement of social
competence is appropriate to the variety of differing target populations
and contexts, and that interventions occur as early as possible in a child's
life. Social competence should be considered an important developmental
goal for all children (Katz, McClellan, Fuller, & Walz, 1995).
References
Bloom, M. (1990). The psychosocial constructs of social competency. Gullotta,
T. P., Adams, G. R., & Montemayor, R. (eds.). Developing social competency
in adolescence, (pp. 11-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Botvin, G. J. (1996). Substance abuse prevention through life skills training.
Peters, R. D., & McMahon, R. J. (eds.). Preventing childhood disorders,
substance abuse, and delinquency, (pp. 215-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Caplan, M. Z., & Weissberg, R. P (1988). Promoting social competence in
early adolescence: Developmental considerations. Schneider, G. H., Attili,
G., Nadel, J., & Weissberg, R. P. (eds.). Social competence in developmental
perspective, (pp. 371-386). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Danish, S. (1996). Interventions for enhancing adolescents' life skills.
Humanistic Psychologist, 24, 365-381.
Dodge, K. A., & Murphy, R. (1984). The assessment of social competence
in adolescents. Karoly, P., & Steffen, J. J. (eds.). Adolescent behavior
disorders: Foundations and contemporary concerns, (pp. 61-96). Lexington,
MA: Lexington Books.
Gullotta, T. P. (1990). Preface. Gullotta, T. P., Adams, G. R., & Montemayor,
R. (eds.). Developing social competency in adolescence, (pp. 7-8). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Holmes, G. R. (1995). Helping teenagers into adulthood: A guide for the
next generation. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Katz, L. G., McClellan, D. E., Fuller, J. O., & Walz, G. R. (1995). Building
social competence in children: A practical handbook for counselors, psychologist,
and teachers. ERIC Counseling & Student Services Clearinghouse and ERIC
Elementary and Early Childhood Education Clearinghouse.
Oppenheimer, L. (1988). The nature of social action: Social competence
versus social comformism. Schneider, B., Attili, G., Nadel, J., & Weissberg,
R. P. (eds.). Social competence in developmental perspective, (pp. 41-70).
Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Peterson, G. W., & Leigh, G. K. (1990). The family and social competence
in adolescence. Gullotta, T. P., Adams, G. R., Montemayor, T. (eds.).
Developing social competency in adolescence, (pp. 97-138). Newbury Park,
CA: Sage Publications.
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316-331.
Schinke, S. P., McAlister, A. L., Orlandi, M. A., & Botvin, G. J. (1990).
The social environmental constructs of social competency. Gullotta, T.
P., Adams, G. R., & Montemayor, R. (eds.). Developing social competency
in adolescence, (pp. 28-42). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Weissberg, R. P., Barton, H. A., & Shriver, T. P. (1997). The social competence
promotion program for young adolescents. Albee, G. W., & Gullotta, T.
P. (eds.). Primary prevention works, (pp. 268-290). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
|