Program
Outcomes for Youth
Social Competencies
Problem Solving
Measures
Name: |
Adolescent Problem Inventory
for Boys (API); for Girls (PIAG) |
Author: |
API: B. J. Freedman; APIG: L. R. Gaffney & R. M. McFall |
Date: |
API - 1978; APIG - 1981 |
Instrument Description:
|
Designed to assess the competence of adolescent's
problem-solving skills. Uses tape recorded readings of specific, hypothetical
social situations involving requests, temptations, demands, and accusations
of peers, parents and adult authorities. A maximally skillful response
shows more effective resolution of the problem and considers it less
likely the adolescent will face more of the same problem in the future.
An overall score of social skills is obtained by averaging scores
across situations. |
Where Available: |
literature |
Literature Reference: |
API: Freedman, B. J.,
Donahoe, C., Rosenthal, L., Schlundt, D. G., & McFall, R. M. (1978).
A social-behavioral analysis of skill deficits in delinquent and nondelinquent
adolescent boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46,
p. 1448-1462. APIG: Gaffney, L. R. & McFall, R. M. (1981).
A comparison of social skills in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent
girls using a behavioral role playing inventory. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 49, p. 959-967. |
Cost: |
Not available |
Intended Audience: |
Adolescents |
Subtests: |
None |
Psychometrics: |
Validity supported for both Black and
Caucasian adolescents. Alphas for the shortened versions showed high
correlations with their 52 item measure with Cronbach's Alphas for
the shortened measure for boys was .79 and for girls was .85. |
Advantages/Disadvantages |
both long and short versions |
Name: |
Problem Solving Inventory
(PSI) |
Author: |
P. Paul Heppner, |
Date: |
1988 |
Instrument Description:
|
The inventory consists of a 35-item self-report
measure in a 6-point Likert style format (strongly agree to strongly
disagree). The measure is designed to assess an individual's perceptions
of his or her capabilities with regards to problem-solving behaviors
and attitudes. In other words, the PSI measures a person's self-assessed
level of efficacy as a problem solver. The PSI provides a single,
general index of problem-solving self-efficacy using a total score
and the problem-solving dimensions of Problem-Solving Confidence (self
assurance while engaging in problem-solving activities), Approach-Avoidance
Style (a general tendency to either approach or avoid problem-solving
activities), and Personal Control (determines the extent of control
one feels they have over emotions and behaviors while solving problems).
High scores indicate general negative self appraisal. Areas of potential
use for the PSI: clinical and counseling assessment, research, contrasting
actual abilities of an individual with their problem solving appraisal,
training, and program evaluation. |
Where Available: |
Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto,
CA |
Literature Reference: |
Heppner, P. P., & Petersen,
C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving
inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, p. 66-75. |
Cost: |
$14.50 per 25 test booklets; $12.00 for
manual; $13.00 per specimen set (manual, test booklet, scoring key) |
Intended Audience: |
appears to be designed primarily for adults,
ages 16+ |
Subtests: |
Problem-Solving Confidence (self assurance
while engaging in problem-solving activities), Approach-Avoidance
Style (a general tendency to either approach or avoid problem-solving
activities), and Personal Control (determines the extent of control
one feels they have over emotions and behaviors while solving problems) |
Psychometrics: |
Estimates of reliability in terms of test-retest
based on 2 week duration were r's in the mid 80's for each of the
subtests, and .89 for the inventory total. Internal consistency using
Cronbach's alpha ranging from .72 to ..85 for the subtests and .90
for the inventory total. Concurrent, discriminate, and construct validity
have been assessed across various research studies and found correlations
between the factors and the total PSI to be significant. |
Advantages/Disadvantages |
The PSI takes approximately 10-15 minutes
to complete and may be given to a group or individual. As it is a
self-report, there is the potential for bias in the reporting. The
inventory has been used primarily on adults but the manual fails to
specify the reading level required for its maximal use. The inventory
has it's strongest track record in research with clinical usage needing
further testing to determine its appropriateness and usefulness. |
Name: |
Social Problem-Solving Inventory
for Adolescents (SPSI-A) |
Author: |
Marianne Frauenknecht and David R. Black |
Date: |
1995 |
Instrument Description:
|
The instrument was designed as a structured
self-report personality test to assess both covert and overt dispositions
in problem-solving. The behaviors were to be reported regardless of
whether they occurred or did not occurred in either social or personal
contexts. The instrument was originally designed for adults (T. D'Zurilla
and A. Nezu), but the current authors modified the reading level of
the original to a stage that was appropriate for adolescents. The
SPSI-A has three scales: Automatic Process, Problem Orientation, and
Problem-Solving Skills. Two of the scales consist of separate subscales.
The Problem Orientation Skills subscales are Cognition, Emotion, and
Behavior; The Problem-Solving Skills scales consists of Problem Identification,
Alternative Generation, Consequence Prediction, and Implementation/Evaluation/Reorganization.
Negative item responses are reversed and scores calculated by summing
the numerical responses for each item and dividing them by the total
number of items for the inventory, scale, or subscales used. High
scores equate to greater self-perceptions of problem-solving ability. |
Where Available: |
The instrument was designed as a structured
self-report personality test to assess both covert and overt dispositions
in problem-solving. The behaviors were to be reported regardless of
whether they occurred or did not occurred in either social or personal
contexts. The instrument was originally designed for adults (T. D'Zurilla
and A. Nezu), but the current authors modified the reading level of
the original to a stage that was appropriate for adolescents. The
SPSI-A has three scales: Automatic Process, Problem Orientation, and
Problem-Solving Skills. Two of the scales consist of separate subscales.
The Problem Orientation Skills subscales are Cognition, Emotion, and
Behavior; The Problem-Solving Skills scales consists of Problem Identification,
Alternative Generation, Consequence Prediction, and Implementation/Evaluation/Reorganization.
Negative item responses are reversed and scores calculated by summing
the numerical responses for each item and dividing them by the total
number of items for the inventory, scale, or subscales used. High
scores equate to greater self-perceptions of problem-solving ability. |
Literature Reference: |
Marianne Frauenknecht, Dept.
of Health, Physical Education, & Recreation, Western Michigan
University, 4024-6 GC, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-3871 |
Cost: |
Not available |
Intended Audience: |
Adolescents; tested on 9th & 10th
graders, mean age was 15.0 years old |
Subtests: |
Two of the scales consist of separate
subscales. The Problem Orientation Skills subscales are Cognition,
Emotion, and Behavior; The Problem-Solving Skills scales consists
of Problem Identification, Alternative Generation, Consequence Prediction,
and Implementation/Evaluation/Reorganization. |
Psychometrics: |
Internal consistency was assessed as a
measure of homogeneity. Alpha coefficients for total scale reliability
were greater than r = .93, and greater than r = .81 for the three
scales. Results indicate that the total instrument, the scales, and
the subscales could be classified as homogeneous and consistent. Test-retest
correlation coefficients over a 2 week period were greater than r
= .76, indicating a relatively stable instrument. Construct validity
was evaluated by correlating the SPSI-A with the Problem-Solving Inventory
(Heppner & Petersen, 1982). A relatively high degree of commonality
was found to exist indicating that both instruments are measuring
similar constructs. |
Advantages/Disadvantages |
Data for psychometrics are preliminary.
However, these initial results indicate that the instrument is a potentially
reliable and valid measure for evaluating problem-solving competencies
and the efficacy of problem-solving programs for adolescents. |
|